The specifics of what constitutes legal malpractice may vary from state to state but, generally speaking, the following actions are the basis of a legal malpractice case:
Similar to a medical malpractice case, the victim of legal malpractice must prove that he or she suffered some sort of significant injury. With legal malpractice, the injury is not physical; rather it would be in the form of a guilty verdict in a criminal case or an insufficient judgment in a civil case. It must also be proven that the injury was a direct result of the attorney’s actions or lack of action and that the injury was significant enough to warrant a case of legal malpractice.
In order to prove legal malpractice, it must first be proven that the original case would have had a different outcome if not for the actions or inaction of the lawyer involved. In a criminal case that means you would have to show that you would not have been convicted had the defense attorney acted differently. In a civil case, you would have to prove either that you would have won the case or received a larger settlement if not for the actions or lack of action by your attorney. In order to do this, it may be necessary first to present the original case over again. This is often referred to as a trial-within-a-trial.
The attorneys at Rotolo Karch Law have experience in both criminal and civil defense cases. They are familiar with the legal malpractice laws as they pertain to the State of New Jersey and can evaluate the facts of your case. If it is determined that you have a valid legal malpractice claim, our attorneys are prepared to work toward seeking the verdict or settlement to which you are entitled.